|
|
@@ -578,7 +578,10 @@ research would be in place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expectation is that using a larger diameter pattern, but with the same
|
|
|
amount of points is worth trying. The theory behind that is that when using a
|
|
|
-gaussian blur to reduce noise, the edges are blurred as well. By
|
|
|
+Gaussian blur to reduce noise, the edges are blurred as well. By taking larger
|
|
|
+radius, you look over a larger distance, so the blurry part of the edge is
|
|
|
+skipped. By not using more points, there is no penalty in the time needed to
|
|
|
+calculate this larger pattern, so there is an accuracy advantage `for free'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Context Information}
|
|
|
|